Union Power
Undoubtedly, unions and parties have greatly contributed to strengthening labour vis-Ã -vis
capital in many situations. But the conceptualisation of the PRA has the problematic
consequence that any strategy of unions and parties where stated aims are achieved can be
declared a successful exercise of workers’ power – no matter what the effects are of this strategy
on workers as a class. Sectionalism and collusion with management or with pro-business
governments on the side of unions as well as accommodating strategies on the side of labour
parties have delivered, in certain cases, some benefits for the rank-and-file of the organisations in
question. However, they usually have extremely divisive effects on workers in society as a whole,
thus weakening the overall position of labour. Furthermore, unions – in particular in countries in
the Global South with huge informal sectors – often struggle to reach beyond very narrow
constituencies. In these settings, union strategies may be geared to a small minority of workers
and obstruct working-class formation in the sense of a process in which the collective agency of
workers as a class and an antagonist of capital is strengthened. Finally, there is the persistent issue
of union and party-political corruption, which contributes greatly to turning workers away from
Undoubtedly, unions and parties have greatly contributed to strengthening labour vis-Ã -vis
capital in many situations. But the conceptualisation of the PRA has the problematic
consequence that any strategy of unions and parties where stated aims are achieved can be
declared a successful exercise of workers’ power – no matter what the effects are of this strategy
on workers as a class. Sectionalism and collusion with management or with pro-business
governments on the side of unions as well as accommodating strategies on the side of labour
parties have delivered, in certain cases, some benefits for the rank-and-file of the organisations in
question. However, they usually have extremely divisive effects on workers in society as a whole,
thus weakening the overall position of labour. Furthermore, unions – in particular in countries in
the Global South with huge informal sectors – often struggle to reach beyond very narrow
constituencies. In these settings, union strategies may be geared to a small minority of workers
and obstruct working-class formation in the sense of a process in which the collective agency of
workers as a class and an antagonist of capital is strengthened. Finally, there is the persistent issue
of union and party-political corruption, which contributes greatly to turning workers away from
Undoubtedly, unions and parties have greatly contributed to strengthening labour vis-Ã -vis
capital in many situations. But the conceptualisation of the PRA has the problematic
consequence that any strategy of unions and parties where stated aims are achieved can be
declared a successful exercise of workers’ power – no matter what the effects are of this strategy
on workers as a class. Sectionalism and collusion with management or with pro-business
governments on the side of unions as well as accommodating strategies on the side of labour
parties have delivered, in certain cases, some benefits for the rank-and-file of the organisations in
question. However, they usually have extremely divisive effects on workers in society as a whole,
thus weakening the overall position of labour. Furthermore, unions – in particular in countries in
the Global South with huge informal sectors – often struggle to reach beyond very narrow
constituencies. In these settings, union strategies may be geared to a small minority of workers
and obstruct working-class formation in the sense of a process in which the collective agency of
workers as a class and an antagonist of capital is strengthened. Finally, there is the persistent issue
of union and party-political corruption, which contributes greatly to turning workers away from